Fashion and Art Essay

A controversial debate that has existed for many years, and will probably still be argued for many years to come, is the relatively nigh relationship that manner and imposture has. People in both the behavior and guile industries (or as nearly trickists like to call subterfuge orb) have very mixed opinions and ideas on the collaboration of vogue and art and how one may influence the other in the industry we stand in today.Art is Art and fashion is an industry, as quotationd from in Michael Boodros Art and counterfeit (2007), he believes that Fashion is just a man made craze that has exactly been popularised by the many pursual in public that are cloned to consume the ideas of make. Boodro also believes that fashion comes with no illusions attached He believes that there isnt a depth to fashion as there is in art, he believes art is an academia with coarse depths of knowledge involved as to fashion, which is a shallow and very homochromatic in its appearance, with no hidden messages.He goes on to let off that the interest in fashions first started in the late 1800s/early 1900s when only the rich and wealthy could afford artwork, in a form of portraits, and so these painters created puzzle out fashions in this paintings, learning the art of drapery and how to portray fabrics in the outperform possible light, For example Gustav Klimt, portraits of women, designed dresses that were more prominent than his subjects. avocation on from this, Boodro then goes on to highlight around interesting colligate between art and fashion in how the artists has al personal manners formed the extravagance for the designer, such as Valentino has taken black and white geometric motifs from the Viennese artists Josef Hoffman and Koloman Mosen and embroided them in sequins and dresses Many other examples there to highlight that a divulge to a designers success is by taking inspiration from previous art work by innovative and productive artists, which suppor ts Boodros opinion that fashion is a follower and a form of art.Clothes were showd in an extra-artistic sphere- where the most part they have remained. This is taken from a contrasting fleck of writing from Fashion and Art by L. Svendsen (2006). As you can see, the title of respect Fashion and Art is a reverse to Boodros Art and fashion, this is because, as quoted above, Clothes (fashion) were placed in an extra-artistic sphere, meaning that he sees Fashion as a seperate category to Art, and non a tined off form of art itself.Svendsen has a much more play off opinion for both sides of the opinion, he can pick out where Art and Fashion do merge into one, and also how Fashion has separated itself from art. He stated that in the early 1900s, Fashion was very limited and boundaries were severe due to Freedom was rather restricted, as the creations had to appeal to the aesthetic preferences of the guest.Even though artists and art critics will strongly disagree that Fashion is a form of Art, even iconic designers such as capital of Minnesota Poiret, one of the first iconic fashion designers of the early 20th speed of light stated I am an artist, not a dressmaker, designers hated how critics would limit their title to just a dressmaker, limiting their skills and talents or else of creative s that they dream to be acclaimed for.Another controversial quote though from a famous designer, Martin Margiela who insists that fashion is a craft, not art Moving into the 1920s and 30s with the Cubism perception in artwork replacing realism, Fashion also in turn started to become more abstarct, and this was when Haute Couture was born, designs became more elaborate and the previous boundaries that existed were lifted, giving designers a vast playground in which they could get word with their work and ideas.Many Fashion Designers have used strategies normally associated with modern-day art rather than the world of fashion, by creating clothes that are give suited t o exhibitions in galleries and museums than for actual wearThis shows a great standoff between fashion and art, it was evolving to become so abstract and outrageous that the best way for them to be displayed to their best potential was in galleries and museums, the same way as artwork would be, For example now in Museums such as the Victoria and Albert in London, there is now Fashion Archives, and many transnational designers have homed themselves there for one-off elaborate exhibitions.To conclude I think that I would categorise Fashion as a form of art, but not a direct result of art, I think many flock have similar opinions of the two because they are such broad topics with an some unlimited amount of space for creativity. I do agree that some of fashions many successful collections and campaigns stemmed from the innovative ideas of previous artists but some of the more successful fashion moments have been solely down to the creative minds of the designer If I had to categori ze the fashion industry and the Designers work, I would place it under craftsmanship and creativity, as previously quoted by Martin Margiela. To finalise though I believe that art and fashion shouldnt be designate and the two should be able to intertwine to create magical and nasty pieces.